Los Angeles Microplastic Data
Why There's Zero Public Data on Microplastics in LA Water
Your annual water quality report says your water is “safe.” But that report is completely silent on microplastics. Here's why.
The Cost of Independent Testing
$500–$1,200
The typical cost for a certified laboratory microplastic water test — proving that this data is not being generated by the public themselves.
“I'm a plumber in the LA area. 99% of plumbers use PEX (Poly Ethylene Crosslink) piping to re-pipe old houses. The oxidants in the water — chlorine, chloramine — cause extreme degradation, and the pipes literally release parts of themselves into the water. This is accelerated 10 fold on hot water.”
u/Disastrous-Number-88 — Licensed plumber, LA/OC/SD
Open Source Data
LA Microplastic Test Results
Real particle counts from 41 samples tested across Los Angeles. This data is free to use under CC BY 4.0.
| Neighborhood | Date | Particle Count | Level | Filter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ocean Park | 3/29/2026 | 6/100ml | Moderate | nylon 0.22µm |
| Encinitas | 3/27/2026 | 6/100ml | Moderate | nylon 0.22µm |
| Encinitas | 3/27/2026 | 21/100ml | High | nylon 0.22µm |
| Brentwood | 3/27/2026 | 12/100ml | Moderate | nylon 0.22µm |
| Simi Valley | 3/26/2026 | 2/100ml | Low | nylon .22um |
| Simi Valley | 3/26/2026 | 14/100ml | Moderate | nylon .22um |
| Ocean Park | 3/25/2026 | 9/100ml | Moderate | nylon .22um |
| Ocean Park | 3/25/2026 | 8/100ml | Moderate | nylon .22um |
| Pacific Palisades | 3/11/2026 | 10/100ml | Moderate | nylon .22um |
| Pacific Palisades | 3/11/2026 | 17/100ml | High | nylon .22um |
| Newport Beach | 3/9/2026 | 15/100ml | Moderate | nylon .22 |
| Crenshaw | 3/7/2026 | 31/100ml | High | nylon .22um |
| Crenshaw | 3/7/2026 | 13/100ml | Moderate | nylon .22um |
| Duarte | 3/4/2026 | 0/100ml | Low | nylon .22um |
| Duarte | 3/4/2026 | 9/100ml | Moderate | nylon .22um |
| Fox Hills | 3/4/2026 | 2/100ml | Low | nylon .22um |
| Fox Hills | 3/4/2026 | 5/100ml | Low | nylon .22um |
| Pasadena Council District 7 | 3/4/2026 | 32/100ml | High | nylon .22um |
| Pasadena Council District 7 | 3/4/2026 | 27/100ml | High | nylon .22um |
| Daly City | 3/3/2026 | 23/100ml | High | nylon .22um |
| Daly City | 3/3/2026 | 6/100ml | Moderate | nylon .22um |
| Culver City | 3/2/2026 | 11/100ml | Moderate | nylon .22um |
| Culver City | 3/2/2026 | 22/100ml | High | nylon .22um |
| Palm Springs | 2/16/2026 | 52/100ml | Very High | nylon .22µm |
| Santa Monica | 1/27/2026 | 1/100ml | Low | nylon .22µm |
| Brentwood | 1/27/2026 | 1/100ml | Low | nylon .22µm |
| Westwood | 1/27/2026 | 0/100ml | Low | nylon .22µm |
| West LA | 1/27/2026 | 6/100ml | Moderate | nylon .22µm |
| Marina Del Rey | 1/27/2026 | 2/100ml | Low | nylon .22µm |
| Santa Monica | 1/27/2026 | 3/100ml | Low | nylon .22µm |
| Santa Monica | 1/27/2026 | 17/100ml | High | nylon .22µm |
| Santa Monica | 1/27/2026 | 11/100ml | Moderate | nylon .22µm |
| West LA | 1/27/2026 | 9/100ml | Moderate | nylon .22µm |
| Marina Del Rey | 1/27/2026 | 26/100ml | High | nylon .22µm |
| Marina Del Rey | 1/27/2026 | 12/100ml | Moderate | glass 1.6µm |
| Venice | 1/26/2026 | 16/100ml | High | PCTE .20µm |
| Santa Monica | 1/26/2026 | 7/100ml | Moderate | PCTE .20µm |
| Santa Monica | 1/26/2026 | 22/100ml | High | PCTE .20µm |
| West LA | 1/25/2026 | 14/100ml | Moderate | nylon .20µm |
| La Jolla | 1/17/2026 | 5/100ml | Low | glass 1.6µm |
| Mar Vista | 1/1/2026 | 4/100ml | Low | glass 1.6µm |
Data updated January 2026. Particle counts measured via fluorescence microscopy with Nile Red staining.
LA Contamination Map
Click any dot to see the actual microscope image from that location.
Locations are approximate to protect privacy. Click dots for details.
The Three Data Gaps
Understanding why microplastic contamination remains invisible to LA residents
1. Missing from Consumer Confidence Reports
The Truth
Every year, LA utilities must mail residents a Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) detailing regulated contaminants like Lead, Arsenic, Copper, Chlorine, and E. coli. But microplastics have no federal Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) — so they are excluded from these standard public reports.
The Gap
Your neighbors receive a report saying their water is 'Safe,' but that report is completely silent on microplastics.
2. No Neighborhood-Level Data
The Truth
Academic studies usually take a few dozen samples from treatment plants, not from individual kitchen taps across the city. There is no granular, zip-code-level map where a resident can look up microplastic levels in Silver Lake vs. Santa Monica.
The Gap
We're mapping the last mile — the aging pipes in people's actual homes — data that truly does not exist publicly.
3. California's Data Isn't Public
The Truth
California is the only state actively working on defining how to test for microplastics, but they are in the 'Monitoring Order' phase (2022–2025), not the 'Public Map' phase. Even if the state has raw data in government spreadsheets, it is not accessible or understandable to consumers.
The Gap
We're making the data visible and accessible — not buried in technical reports.
The Bottom Line
“The City tests for lead. Nobody tests for microplastics. There is currently zero public data on contamination in our specific neighborhoods.”
This is factually accurate regarding consumer-accessible data at the neighborhood level. You cannot go to a government website right now and see a map of microplastics in LA zip codes.
CCRs omit microplastics — no federal requirement means they're legally absent from public mailings.
State programs collect data but don't publish it — functionally inaccessible public data.
No open ZIP-level map exists — granular public data equals zero.
Independent lab tests cost $500–$1,200 — preventing widespread self-testing.
Sources & References
EPA's official list of regulated contaminants includes no entry for microplastics.
EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations, 2024The LADWP 2024 Water Quality Report lists zero mentions of 'microplastics.'
LADWP 2024 Water Quality Report (CCR)California's Microplastics Drinking Water Testing Program is still in data collection phase.
State Water Resources Control Board, 2024Independent microplastic testing costs $500–$1,200 per sample.
Eurofins, ALS, SGS Environmental Testing Labs, 2025Academic Reference: “Occurrence of Microplastics in California Drinking Water,” Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2023
See What's in Your Water
Get your own high-res microscopy results — and add your neighborhood to LA's first microplastic map.
Help us build the first complete map of LA
Other methods cost $598+ for the same analysis