Drinking water quality · 2024

· Verified

What's in St George, UT tap water

29 contaminants were measured in the St George, UT water system's 2024 annual report. Each is shown below against its federal limit 6 sit at or above that limit.

Reporting year
2024
Contaminants measured
29
Over federal limit
6
Approaching the limit
1
Worst contaminant
Total Dissolved Solids
936.0× the limit
Service area
UT
state-level CCR
Source
Utility CCR

PFAS — EPA UCMR5 (2023–2025)

1 PFAS compound detected in St George, UT

About this data

The EPA finalized the first-ever federal drinking-water limits for six PFAS compounds in April 2024. These numbers come straight from EPA's UCMR5 lab dataset — every U.S. system serving more than 3,300 people tested every PFAS sample at an entry point to its distribution system. PFAS not listed below were either tested and not detected, or not yet sampled.

Lithium

● Detected (no federal limit)
Measured 180 mg/LSample year 2024Samples 11 detect / 18

2.3× the national p90 (76.59999999999991 mg/L across detecting U.S. systems)

PWSID UTAH27015 · Source: EPA UCMR5. Limits per EPA's April 2024 PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation. PFAS values reported in nanograms per liter (ng/L) — note that 1 ng/L = 1 part per trillion.

Where your water comes from · EPA SDWIS

St George, UT's drinking water comes from ground water, drawn from 29 sources.

Source

29ground water
  • GUNLOCK · 8
  • SNOW CANYON · 5
  • TOLMAN · 2
  • LEDGES
  • + 13 more

Treatment

14treatment plants
  • ARSENIC SNOW CANYON EFFLUENT BLEND
  • ARSENIC-WCWD PIPELINE WS040
  • T-BONE CHLORINATOR
  • + 11 more

Distribution

20storage units

Also buys water from WASHINGTON COUNTY WCD - SAND HOLLOW, WASHINGTON COUNTY WCD - QUAIL LAKE, and 2 more.

Historical readings · EPA Six-Year Review (2012–2019)

2 contaminants historically over EPA limits in St George, UT

About this data

Every U.S. public water system reports compliance-monitoring data to EPA. The Six-Year Review releases the 2012–2019 window as a single dataset — here's what your system reported, year by year. Values shown are the highest detection per analyte per year, compared to the federal MCL.

ContaminantWorst detectionEPA limitYears (2012–2019)
ARSENIC
worst: 2016
0.036 mg/L
3.6×
2.7× the national p90
0.01 mg/L
'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19
GROSS BETA
worst: 2014
5.2 mrem/yr
1.3×
4 mrem/yr
'13'14'16
TTHM
worst: 2017
0.0748 mg/L
94%
0.08 mg/L
'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19
RADIUM 226 228
worst: 2015
3.7 pCi/L
within
near national p90
5 pCi/L
'13'14'15'16'17'18'19
NITRATE NITRITE
worst: 2013
6.9 mg/L
within
10 mg/L
'13'18
FLUORIDE
worst: 2015
2.3 mg/L
within
4 mg/L
'12'13'14'15'17'18
HAA5
worst: 2013
0.0311 mg/L
within
0.06 mg/L
'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19
GROSS ALPHA
worst: 2014
7.6 pCi/L
within
15 pCi/L
'13'14'15'16'17'19
THALLIUM
worst: 2018
0.00054 mg/L
within
0.002 mg/L
'17'18
ANTIMONY
worst: 2018
0.0012 mg/L
within
below national p90
0.006 mg/L
'18
BARIUM
worst: 2015
0.28 mg/L
within
above national p90
2 mg/L
'13'15'17'18
NITRATE
worst: 2015
1 mg/L
within
10 mg/L
'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19
LINDANE
worst: 2017
0.000013 mg/L
within
below national p90
0.0002 mg/L
'17
CYANIDE
worst: 2018
0.0087 mg/L
within
below national p90
0.2 mg/L
'18
CHROMIUM
worst: 2015
0.0038 mg/L
within
below national p90
0.1 mg/L
'15
SELENIUM
worst: 2017
0.00087 mg/L
within
0.05 mg/L
'17'18
CHLOROBENZENE
worst: 2012
0.0005 mg/L
within
below national p90
0.1 mg/L
'12
URANIUM
worst: 2015
0.0058 ug/L
within
below national p90
30 ug/L
'13'14'15'16
COPPER
worst: 2012
0.1 mg/L
below national p90
'12'15'18
LEAD
worst: 2018
0.014 mg/L
'18
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
worst: 2013
0.0068 mg/L
'13'15'18
BROMOFORM
worst: 2013
0.0056 mg/L
'13'15'18
CHLOROFORM
worst: 2013
0.006 mg/L
'13'18
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
worst: 2013
0.0063 mg/L
'13'15'18
PWSID UTAH27015 · Source: EPA Six-Year Review 4 (2012–2019). Values are the highest detection in each calendar year; non-detect years are omitted. Year tags above show every year with a detection.

Physical & aggregate

ContaminantMeasuredStatus
Total Dissolved SolidsTotal dissolved solids — the combined content of all dissolved minerals and salts.118–936 mg/LRangeCity of St. George Groundwater SourcesAt or above the limit
+By source (3)City of St. George Groundwater Sources, Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTP, Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow Wells
  • City of St. George Groundwater SourcesPlant
    range118–936 mg/L93600% of limit
  • Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTPPlant
    55200% of limit
  • Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow WellsPlant
    47200% of limit
TurbidityA measure of cloudiness from suspended particles in the water.1.3 NTUReported levelWashington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow WellsWithin the limit
+By source (3)Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow Wells, City of St. George Groundwater Sources, Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTP
  • Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow WellsPlant
    26% of limit
  • City of St. George Groundwater SourcesPlant
    range0–0.66 NTU13% of limit
  • Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTPPlant
    2% of limit
TOCTotal organic carbon — a measure of organic material dissolved in the water.2.2 mg/LReported levelWashington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTPDetected — no federal limit

Metals

ContaminantMeasuredStatus
AluminumA common element sometimes used as a treatment coagulant.200 ug/LReported levelWashington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTPAt or above the limit
MercuryA toxic metal from erosion of natural deposits and industrial runoff.0–0.2 ug/LRangeCity of St. George Groundwater SourcesAt or above the limit
+By source (3)City of St. George Groundwater Sources, Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTP, Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow Wells
  • City of St. George Groundwater SourcesPlant
    range0–0.2 ug/L100% of limit
  • Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTPPlant
    0% of limit
  • Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow WellsPlant
    0% of limit
ManganeseA naturally occurring metal from soil and rock.2 ug/LReported levelWashington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow WellsWithin the limit
CalciumA naturally occurring mineral that contributes to water hardness.18–95 mg/LRangeCity of St. George Groundwater SourcesDetected — no federal limit
+By source (2)City of St. George Groundwater Sources, Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTP
  • City of St. George Groundwater SourcesPlant
    range18–95 mg/L
  • Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTPPlant
MagnesiumA naturally occurring mineral that contributes to water hardness.38 mg/LReported levelWashington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTPDetected — no federal limit
SodiumA naturally occurring salt component.5–153 mg/LRangeCity of St. George Groundwater SourcesDetected — no federal limit
+By source (3)City of St. George Groundwater Sources, Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow Wells, Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTP
  • City of St. George Groundwater SourcesPlant
    range5–153 mg/L
  • Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow WellsPlant
  • Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTPPlant

Inorganic chemicals

ContaminantMeasuredStatus
SulfateA naturally occurring mineral from rock and soil.1.38–451 mg/LRangeCity of St. George Groundwater SourcesApproaching the limit
+By source (3)City of St. George Groundwater Sources, Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTP, Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow Wells
  • City of St. George Groundwater SourcesPlant
    range1.38–451 mg/L90% of limit
  • Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTPPlant
    42% of limit
  • Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow WellsPlant
    24% of limit

Disinfectants

ContaminantMeasuredStatus
ChlorineA disinfectant added to drinking water to kill bacteria and viruses.0.1–1.19 mg/LRangeCity of St. George Groundwater SourcesWithin the limit

Microbial

ContaminantMeasuredStatus
Escherichia coli (E. coli)Escherichia coli — bacteria found in the gut of humans and animals.0RangeCity of St. George Groundwater SourcesNone detected
Total ColiformA group of bacteria used as an indicator of overall water-system sanitation.3RangeCity of St. George Groundwater SourcesDetected — no federal limit

Radionuclides

ContaminantMeasuredStatus
Combined RadiumCombined radium-226 and radium-228 — naturally occurring radioactive elements.2.6 pCi/LReported levelWashington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow WellsDetected — no federal limit
+By source (3)Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow Wells, City of St. George Groundwater Sources, Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTP
  • Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Sand Hollow WellsPlant
  • City of St. George Groundwater SourcesPlant
    range0.2–0.62 pCi/L
  • Washington County Water Conservancy District Sources Quail Creek WTPPlant
Source: St George, UT's 2024 Consumer Confidence Report — the annual drinking-water report every U.S. utility is required to publish. The numbers on this page are the utility's own. A water-quality report covers an entire service area, not a single address.

People also ask about St George, UT's water

+Is St George, UT tap water safe to drink in 2024?

The 2024 Consumer Confidence Report for the St George, UT water utility lists 6 contaminants at or above the federal limit: Total Dissolved Solids, Barium, Copper, Aluminum, Mercury, and Thallium. Whether that means the water is "unsafe" depends on which contaminant, how long the exposure, and individual health factors. The table on this page shows the measured value, the federal threshold, and the regulated statistic used for compliance.

+What contaminants are in St George, UT tap water?

29 contaminants were measured in St George, UT's 2024 Consumer Confidence Report, spanning metals, inorganic chemicals, and physical & aggregate. 24 have an enforceable federal limit; the rest are detected but unregulated. Every measured value, in the utility's own units, is on this page.

+Which contaminants exceed federal limits in St George, UT tap water?

6 contaminants in St George, UT's 2024 report sit at or above the federal limit: Total Dissolved Solids (936.0× the limit); Barium (143.5× the limit); Copper (69.2× the limit); Aluminum (4.0× the limit); Mercury (1.0× the limit); Thallium (1.0× the limit). The EPA enforces these limits against the regulated reporting statistic — typically a running annual average or 90th percentile — not a one-off sample spike.

+What is the worst contaminant in St George, UT tap water?

The contaminant with the highest measured value relative to its federal limit in the 2024 report is Total Dissolved Solids, at 936.0× the federal threshold. It belongs to the physical & aggregate family of contaminants.

+Are any contaminants in St George, UT tap water approaching the federal limit?

One contaminant is between 80% and 100% of the federal limit in this report: Sulfate. Approaching means measured but not in violation — a margin that can close quickly if conditions change.

+Where does the data on this page come from?

Every value is transcribed from St George, UT's 2024 Consumer Confidence Report — the annual drinking-water report every U.S. public water utility is required by federal law to publish. The original source document is archived and viewable on this site. A water-quality report covers an entire service area, not a single address.

+How often is St George, UT's water quality data updated?

Each U.S. public water utility publishes one Consumer Confidence Report per year, covering the prior calendar year's measurements. This page reflects the 2024 report; a new report will replace it once the utility publishes its next annual update.

More water systems in UT